July 20: This week in AI federal policy
DC/ai Decoded: A weekly newsletter on developments in artificial intelligence, quantum, and data federal policy
This week decoded
Washington’s AI agenda this week is dominated by a collision between views on data centers. On Capitol Hill, the House Energy and Commerce Committee will mark up legislation on data center energy costs. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh provided testimony on AI-driven data center investment now powering measurable GDP growth. Meanwhile, the House Education and Workforce Committee continues its cross-country series on AI workforce readiness.
Senate Commerce Committee Chair Ted Cruz (R-TX) was reportedly targeting July 29 to mark up a package of artificial intelligence bills, but the funeral of late-Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is expected to impact the Senate calendar in the remaining weeks before the August recess. On the House side, Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) suggested the next draft of his Great American AI Act could include a modified approach to its current three-year preemption of state AI laws.
The White House launched a federal cybersecurity clearinghouse to leverage AI in coordinating cyber threat and remediation information across the Federal government and private sector.
Read more below
Congress
Hearings
Last week
On July 14, the House Small Business Committee held a hearing on “AI on Main Street: How AI is Shaping the Future of Small Business.”
On July 14, the House Oversight and Government Reform Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs Subcommittee held a hearing on “Roundtable - Winning the Economic Competition with China: Working Families, the AI Race, and Energy.”
On July 14, the House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing on “FY2027 BIS (Bureau of Industry and Security) Budget: the AI Arms Race and the ICTS (Information and Communications Technology and Services) Office.”
On July 15, the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Operations held a hearing on “Emerging Fraud Threats and the Evolving Fraud Landscape,” which examined the use and effectiveness of digital identity verification platforms.
This week
On July 20, the House Energy and Commerce Committee holds a markup of numerous bills, including the “Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act.”
On July 21, the House Administration Committee holds a hearing on “Modernizing Public Access to Legislative Data and Information.”
On July 21, the House Education and Workforce Committee holds a markup of multiple bills, including the “K-12 AI Literacy and Readiness Act of 2026.”
On July 22, the House Science, Space and Technology Committee holds a hearing on “Unleashing the Golden Age of Science: Examining the Priorities of the FY2027 Research and Technology Enterprise.”
On July 22, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade holds a hearing on “Legislative Proposals to Strengthen Consumer Protection in a Changing Marketplace.”
On July 24, the House Education and Workforce Committee holds a field hearing on “Building an AI-Ready America: How AI Is Creating Opportunities Across America’s Workforce.”
Legislation
The AI OVERWATCH Act was accepted as an amendment to the Senate’s Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). (Text)
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Ranking Member Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) introduced a Congressional Review Act joint resolution to overturn the Department of Health and Human Services’ Under the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) model, an AI pilot program used to approve or deny procedures for Medicare patients. (Press release)
Sens. Mike Rounds (R-SD) and Martin Heinrich (D-NM) introduced the Homestake AI Act to establish a pilot program in the Department of Energy (DOE) focused on the collection, cataloguing and sequencing of whole genomes and metabolites from samples collected in unique locations. (Text)
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) introduced the Health and Location Data Protection Act to prohibit data brokers from selling and transferring certain sensitive data. (Text)
Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) introduced the blocking CCP Spy Tech Act to require a review of the national security risk posed by communications equipment and services produced or provided by CCP-related entities. (Text)
Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) introduced the Conversational AI Services Act to establish requirements and guidelines for conversational AI services. (Text)
Reps. Herb Conaway (D-NJ) and Greg Murphy (R-NC) introduced the Protecting Patients from Automated Denials Act to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to establish requirements for the use of artificial intelligence in prior authorization denials by Medicare Advantage organizations. (Text)
Reps. Don Davis (D-NC) and Zach Nunn (R-IA) introduced the Fostering Agricultural Research and Modernization through Artificial Intelligence (FARM AI) Act to accelerate the deployment of artificial intelligence across American agriculture by modernizing U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) research and workforce programs. (Text)
Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) introduced a bill to permit the use of artificial intelligence in arbitration.
Reps. Don Beyer (D-VA), Tom Barrett (R-MI), and Sara Jacobs (D-CA) introduced the Human Authority over Autonomous Weapons Act to establish a clear legal requirement that commanders and operators retain appropriate levels of human judgment in decisions involving the use of lethal force by autonomous or artificial intelligence-enabled weapon systems. (Text)
Publications and Events
Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) published an op-ed in the Washington Examiner entitled “Trump sees the China threat: America must do ‘whatever it takes’ to win AI race” about his AI-Ready Federal Data Guidelines Act. (Op-ed)
CRS published a report on “Artificial Intelligence and Biosecurity Issues.” (Report)
CRS published a report on “Semiconductor Fabrication Facilities Funded by the CHIPS Act: Project Status and Considerations for Congress” (Report)
Trump Administration
White House
The White House launched GOLD EAGLE, a program established in President Trump’s June 2, 2026 Executive Order “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security” (EO 14409). The clearinghouse of cybersecurity vulnerability coordination will leverage frontier AI capabilities, reduce duplicative scanning efforts, and deliver prioritized and actionable threat and remediation information across the Federal government and the private sector. (Press release)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
NIST published a notice requesting nominations for appointment to seven existing Federal Advisory Committees, including the Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board, National Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee, and Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology. (Notice)
Government Accountability Office (GAO)
GAO published a report on “Aviation Cybersecurity: FAA and TSA Are Collaborating on Cybersecurity but Need to Address Key Shortfalls” (Report)
GAO published a report on “Identity Verification: GSA Needs to Address Fraud Threats and Technical Issues” (Report)
Noteworthy Quotes
ADMINISTRATION
White House
The White House posted “President Donald J. Trump is calling on the leading U.S. AI companies to build, bring, or buy all of the energy needed for building and operating data centers, ensuring American consumers are protected from price hikes.”
Treasury Department
Treasury Department posted “SecScottBessent joined Treasury staff for a conversation on AI and the economy last week. AI is one of the defining economic opportunities of our lifetime. Under President Trump, we are advancing policies that encourage innovation and drive investment to ensure America remains the global leader in AI.”
Commerce Department
Secretary Howard Lutnick posted “Over the past two weeks, we have worked closely with Anthropic to analyze and approve Fable 5 to ensure alignment across the US Government and strengthen America’s leadership in AI.”
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Chair Paul Atkins posted “Our proposal to permit e-delivery is another step toward building a regulatory framework suitable for the modern era, a key pillar of my agenda. In an age of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology, a default to paper delivery should be a relic, not a standard.”
Federal Reserve
In his testimony before the Senate Banking and House Financial Services Committees, Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh said, “The most striking feature of the economy right now is business investment. The rapid pace—which appears to be accelerating—reflects, in large part, the construction of data centers and the immense demand for the AI-related equipment and software that fill them. Investment in equipment overall increased about 8 percent for the year ending in the first quarter. Within that category, high-tech spending logged an especially impressive growth rate of nearly 25 percent on a four-quarter basis. We don’t know the extent to which the economy will benefit from the AI buildout. Yet it seems inevitable that what is now called “AI investment” will soon be called just ‘investment.’ Even so, new opportunities for the economy introduce new challenges for policymakers. We at the Fed are monitoring the implications for inflation and the labor market.” (Remarks)
CONGRESS
Congressional Progressive Caucus on AI
Rep. Greg Casar (R-TX), as chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, called for Democrats to become “AI populists” which are “Democrats stand[ing] with working people who know in their gut that AI right now is just going to make a few billionaires into trillionaires while making millions of Americans poorer, less safe and less free.” He added “I don’t think that, on AI issues, we should be a party like where we are right now on cryptocurrency, where it’s just not really clear where the Democratic Party stands. We cannot afford for the public to be confused about which of the parties is for them versus the AI companies.” (Politico)
Casar also said, “Of course, fighting back against Trump is important. But I think when we look back at 15 or 20 years, the most important thing that happened in 2026 may be AI development, not whatever crazy thing Trump just did today. … We can’t let the threat that Trump poses overwhelm our ability to organize on AI.” (Politico)
On AI super PACs, Casar said, “I know for a fact that there’s a lot of consultants telling their clients that you don’t want an AI super PAC to spend millions against you, so just don’t touch the issue at all. We absolutely cannot let the AI money silence us.” (Politico)
On job impacts, Casar said, “A new Stanford study finding that young workers in AI-exposed careers are already having trouble finding jobs; mass layoffs at Oracle, which is based in my district in Austin … as those impacts start to be felt more and more across the country, I think the uprising against data centers may wind up looking small compared to the uprising against all of the impacts of unregulated artificial intelligence.” (Politico)
Data Centers
On New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s executive order to implement a one-year pause for hyperscale data centers to assess for environmental impact, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) released a statement saying, “I applaud Governor Hochul for taking decisive action on data center construction. Today’s executive order sends a clear message New Yorkers deserve a say in how this technology impacts their lives and communities. This one-year moratorium is fundamentally about trust. Right now, New Yorkers aren’t convinced these massive facilities benefit them. Before we move forward, our communities need ironclad guarantees that their energy bills won’t spike, their water will be protected, and their air will remain clean. At the federal level, my mission is to ensure AI innovation benefits every American, not just a powerful few. That requires establishing clear, reliable rules of the road. We must build a framework that protects our kids from harmful algorithms and social media tools; shields seniors and consumers from AI-driven scams and fraud; and safeguards American jobs and livelihoods from displacement.” (Press release)
Energy and Commerce Committee posted “Governor Hochul’s data center moratorium halts billions of dollars in investments, destroys good-paying jobs, and hands China the advantage in the AI race. This is a backward step that leaves the United States weaker and empowers our adversaries.”
Energy and Commerce Committee posted “China, Russia, and Iran are allegedly running propaganda campaigns to turn Americans against the very data centers that power American AI. We can’t afford to let that happen. HouseCommerce is fighting to win the AI race — with American values — so the 21st century is led by America, not our adversaries.”
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) posted “The AI data center ‘race to the bottom’ worsens our real climate perils. In a decent world, the industry would agree on safety standards. The billionaires and putative billionaires behind these projects could easily afford to be responsible. They choose not to be.”
Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) posted “The facts clearly show data centers are adding billions to Americans’ electricity bills. And families are sick and tired of footing the bill for Big Tech’s AI ambitions. We need a nationwide moratorium until there are serious guardrails in place to protect ratepayers and the environment.”
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) posted “This is why I’m calling for a federal AI data center moratorium. The rich donors who write this garbage for Trump want a nice fat return on their investment.”
Rep. Pat Fallon (R-TX) posted “The anti-data center movement on the left bears many of the hallmarks of a CCP influence campaign. Why? Because China wants to undermine US AI development. Democrats like Hochul play the useful idiot once again.”
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) posted “Local stakeholders should always be consulted about the location of data centers, but we can’t surrender American leadership in AI to our adversaries. It’s a matter of our economic and national security. “
Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) posted “Armada is doing AI and data centers the right way: with transparency, scalability, and a clear vision for the future. Jon Runyan, co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of armada_ai, and I talked about what’s next after the grand opening.”
Cramer also posted “I want to thank armada_ai and GrandSkyND, and Colonel Rosales and his wife Michaela. Thank you for your incredible service and leadership, and to everybody under your command. When you talk about big data and moving information, so much has been put above ground and underground to support future missions in space, ISR, and everything else. It takes a special kind of leader in a moment like this and a place like this.”
Cramer also posted “It was great to take a look at armada_ai’s wonderful new asset, Triton, at GrandSkyND today. Triton allows us to be both deliberate and fast. You often hear Armada’s leadership talk about scaling to demand, and this is an opportunity to do exactly that because it gives us the ability to bring the asset right to the energy source, which is huge. I’d rather utilize existing power that distributes the cost of infrastructure to more ratepayers rather than fewer.”
Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Rep. John Rutherford (R-FL) posted “I was proud to vote YES on the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act on the House floor this week to safeguard the constitutional rights and privacy of law-abiding gun owners by prohibiting payment processors and financial institutions from using discriminatory merchant category codes (MCCs) to track firearm and ammunition purchases. It is our Second Amendment right to bear arms and the creation of a separate merchant category code for firearm retailers enables the creation of an unconstitutional backdoor gun registry and discrimination against Americans who own and purchase guns.”
Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) posted “Purchasing a lawful product should not subject Americans to additional financial surveillance. I supported the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act to prohibit firearm retailer-specific merchant codes that could be used to track consumers and create a backdoor firearm registry. This legislation safeguards financial privacy and keeps government from using banks and payment processors to monitor the exercise of our Second Amendment rights.”
Rep. Keith Self (R-TX) posted “The PRIVACY Act is a straightforward defense of our constitutional rights. Get a warrant.”
Self also posted “Rep. Keith Self: ‘Americans have a constitutional right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, and our government is supposed to get a warrant before invading that privacy. This bill simply restores that protection. Get a warrant.’”
Self also posted “BILL DROP: The PRIVACY Act! The PRIVACY Act protects Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights by requiring federal law enforcement to obtain a warrant before accessing surveillance data collected through state and local systems. The Constitution is not a suggestion. If the government wants your data, get a warrant.”
Self also posted “Flock’s surveillance network is exploding across more than 6,000 communities nationwide. Congress must be clear: federal law enforcement cannot access this data without a warrant. The Fourth Amendment is not a suggestion. GET A WARRANT! Pass the PRIVACY Act now!”
Rep. Troy Downing (R-MT) posted “Law-abiding Montanans should never end up on a watchlist for exercising their Second Amendment rights. Proud to help pass the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act to prevent banks and payment networks from creating a backdoor registry of lawful firearm and ammunition purchases. Montanans deserve privacy and the full protection of the Second Amendment.”
Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) posted “The Second Amendment is NOT a second-class right. This week, I voted to pass the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act, stopping banks and credit card companies from using firearm-specific merchant category codes that could be used to track the lawful purchases of law-abiding Americans. Your constitutional rights should never be monitored through a backdoor registry. I’ll always stand for the Second Amendment, financial privacy, and against government overreach.”
Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) posted “RepKeithSelf’s PRIVACY Act provides critical protections to combat the federal government’s dangerous web of warrantless surveillance and data collection, including by devices like Flock cameras. Congress must restore the Fourth Amendment. PASS the PRIVACY Act!”
Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) posted “Proud to be an original cosponsor of the PRIVACY Act, which closes loopholes the federal government exploits to bypass Fourth Amendment protections. Grateful to RepKeithSelf for his leadership on this critical issue.”
Rep. Rich McCormick (R-GA) posted “Law-abiding Americans should not end up on a watchlist because they bought a firearm. That’s why I proudly helped pass the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act, stopping banks and payment networks from creating a backdoor registry of lawful gun and ammo purchases. Your Second Amendment rights should not depend on your ZIP code. One national standard. No back-door tracking. Full stop.”
Rep. Riley M. Moore (R-WV) posted “Press Release: Congressman Riley M. Moore’s ‘Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act’ Passes U.S. House Washington, D.C. – Today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed Congressman Riley M. Moore’s bill, H.R. 1181, the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act. This legislation safeguards the constitutional rights and privacy of law-abiding gun owners by prohibiting payment processors and financial institutions from using discriminatory merchant category codes (MCCs) to track firearm and ammunition purchases. Congressman Riley M. Moore released the following statement: ‘The Second Amendment is not a second-class right. Americans should never have their lawful firearm purchases tracked by financial institutions or payment processors. The creation of a separate merchant category code for gun stores at the behest of the Democrat-affiliated Amalgamated Bank opens the door to creating an unconstitutional backdoor gun registry and discrimination against law-abiding gun owners. My bill stops this dangerous overreach, protects consumers’ financial privacy, and ensures that a backdoor federal gun registry can never be created through credit card transaction data. I’m proud the House has acted to defend both the Second Amendment and Americans’ right to privacy.” In 2022, the International Standards Organization approved the creation of a separate merchant category code for firearm and ammunition retailers. Merchant category codes are four-digit identifiers used by payment processors to classify businesses based on the products they sell. The creation of a distinct code for gun stores raised concerns that financial institutions could use payment data to monitor, flag, and track lawful firearm purchases, creating a backdoor gun registry without congressional authorization. As West Virginia State Treasurer, Moore successfully led the charge to ban financial institutions from implementing the firearm retailer specific merchant category code for West Virginia retailers. H.R. 1181 passed the House with the support of 132 cosponsors, including original cosponsors, Rep. Andy Barr and Richard Hudson, and is backed by leading Second Amendment organizations, including the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation, Gun Owners of America, the National Rifle Association, and Heritage Action.’”
Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY) posted “I won’t let government be weaponized to abuse our Constitutional rights. The Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act that I helped lead through the House prevents the data collection of firearms purchases. This doesn’t prevent police from investigating criminal activity but will protect lawful gun owners from being surveilled by their government.”
Rep. Steve Womack (R-AR) posted “With my support, the House just passed the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act to prevent Americans from being unconstitutionally tracked for exercising their 2nd Amendment right.”
Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-SD) posted “Glad to help pass the Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act to stop credit card companies and financial institutions from creating a backdoor registry of gun owners. This is a win for privacy and a win for the Second Amendment!”
Miscellaneous
Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) posted “Big Tech, AI companies, hospitals, and other corporations have abused the H-1B visa program for YEARS! Instead of hiring Americans, they import cheaper foreign labor and the. tell us there’s a ‘worker shortage.’ I introduced the EXILE Act to ELIMINATE the H-1B visa program. America has the best workers in the world and we should utilize them!”
Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) posted “ICE improperly shared the Medicaid data of millions of people with Palantir. This data handling violated strict privacy limits and forced a federal judge to halt the entire program. This is completely unacceptable, and those behind this must be held accountable.”
Rep. Robin Kelly (D-IL) posted “Join my office on July 25th for my privacy fair event in Matteson. We will be providing onsite document shredding and identity theft prevention resources.”
Rep. Sarah Elfreth (D-MD) posted “Whether it’s defense, critical minerals, or even the Chesapeake Bay, we need to be a nation capable of doing big things again. I spoke at the Quantum Tech Showcase to discuss Maryland’s role in advancing this innovative technology. We must capitalize on our incredible partnerships at all levels of government - including the incredible work at UofMaryland to ensure we remain both collaborative and competitive.”
Rep. Zach Nunn (R-IA) posted “The question isn’t whether AI is coming to agriculture, it’s whether the next generation has the tools to use it. Our bipartisan bill makes sure the new technology being built at Iowa State reaches the farmers who’ll put it to work, with the training to go with it, so the next generation inherits a stronger, smarter way to farm.”
Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-NC) posted “I spoke to LACaldwellDC and the535news about introducing the GUARD Act to regulate AI chatbots. As I shared in this interview, I am hearing directly from families who have lost their children after interactions with these chatbots—Congress must take action immediately.”
Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) posted “Every major technological leap has changed how we work. AI has the potential to do for intellectual work what modern machinery did for physical labor. America should lead that future.”
Burlison also posted “One of AI’s greatest promises isn’t replacing people, it’s expanding opportunity. Whether it’s personalized education, legal guidance, or health information, AI can give millions of people access to services that were once available only to those with money. Technology changes society most when it makes opportunity cheaper and more widely available.”
Burlison also posted “Energy multiplied what humans could build with their hands, and now AI has the potential to multiply what humans can create with their minds. Accelerating research, innovation, and problem solving across every industry is how societies become more prosperous.”
Rep. Derek Tran (D-CA) posted “AI is already changing how Main Street does business, and we need to make sure that this technology works for everyone, not just large corporations. AI should be a tool for innovation and opportunity, not a barrier to success.”
Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) posted “As a physician, I’ve watched the digital world take a real toll on our kids’ mental health. That’s why I introduced the Conversational AI Services Act, modeled after Iowa’s own law, to protect children from predatory AI chatbots. Protecting our kids isn’t a partisan issue, it’s a priority we should all share. We cannot repeat the mistakes of the social media era.
Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) posted “Yesterday, I voted to block Trump’s plan to let AI decide whether Medicare will approve or deny your medical care. Every Senate Republican supported Trump’s scheme. Doctors should be deciding what care seniors need – not a computer program.”
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) posted “Trump’s undersecretary who oversees AI exports could not answer my questions about Big Tech’s influence. The government must have vigorous export controls and a well-established interagency process that is independent from the wishes of corporate CEOs.”
Jayapal also posted “Under Trump, Bondi, and Todd Blanche, the Department of Justice failed to redact the personal information of survivors in the Epstein files. Today, I introduced the REDACT Act with Senator Booker to allow survivors to sue for their right to privacy and receive compensation.”
House Science Committee posted “President Trump has called on America to do ‘whatever it takes’ to lead the world in artificial intelligence. In his latest op-ed, Chairman RepBrianBabin outlines how Congress can help secure America’s leadership by unleashing innovation, investing in research, and keeping the United States ahead of the Chinese Communist Party. Read the full op-ed: Trump sees the China threat: America must do ‘whatever it takes’ to win AI race”
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) posted “Senate Republicans just blocked my legislation that would stop the Trump administration from using artificial intelligence to deny seniors’ medical claims. While Trump and Republicans focus on helping private insurers and big AI companies pad their profits, I’m fighting to stop unaccountable machines from blocking seniors’ access to medical care.”
Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-WA) posted “Senate Republicans just voted to continue Trump’s harmful AI Medicare experiment that delays & denies care, and has left seniors in WA & other pilot states suffering in pain for weeks.”
House Committee on Education & Workforce posted “Next stop: Augusta, Georgia. Our 8th hearing in the committee’s AI series will examine how we’re building an AI-ready America.”
Rep. Abe Hamadeh (R-AZ) posted “NEW TSMC just announced a historic investment in Arizona’s Eighth Congressional District to expand semiconductor manufacturing — a massive win for President Trump’s America First agenda and America’s lead in AI. Congressman Hamadeh breaks it down in this video”
Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA) posted “No state has done more to defend American freedom than our Commonwealth. Carlisle armed Washington. Gettysburg reunited a nation. The next chapter is autonomy and AI, and Pennsylvania is already writing it. I hosted the Defense & Innovation Summit so America sees that.”
Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) posted “BREAKING: Democrats tried to stop AI prior authorization in Medicare. Republicans blocked it—apparently they agree with Trump that AI knows better when it comes to health care decisions for our seniors. This isn’t the end. We’ll keep fighting back.”
Rep. Rich McCormick (R-GA) posted “Winning the AI race and strengthening our national security starts with making the chips that power it. TSMC’s additional $100 billion investment in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing is another major win for American jobs, resilient supply chains, and our economic security. Let’s keep building critical technology here at home.”
Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) posted “Here’s how Trump’s Washington works. Trump makes AI investor David Sacks his ‘AI Czar.’ Sacks blocks regulation on AI. Sacks spends millions to help Republicans win elections. Corruption. And you’re paying for it.”
Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN) posted “Today, I spoke at the American Energy Dominance Caucus about the vital connection between energy and artificial intelligence. As Co-Chair, I’m dedicated to preparing America’s grid for the future and ensuring we have the reliable, abundant energy needed to lead in AI.”
Fleischmann also posted “Great meeting with Accenture to discuss AI and the scientific partnerships strengthening our nation’s energy infrastructure and research. Proud to support the cutting-edge work taking place in East Tennessee that keeps America at the forefront of innovation.”
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) posted “We cannot allow AI companies to just run wild.”
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) posted “Millions of dollars in federal funding will bolster CT’s quantum initiative. CT is quickly becoming a nationwide leader in the field & I’m proud to have advocated for this funding which will spur economic development, create good paying jobs & boost cutting-edge research in CT.”
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) posted “Today in JudiciaryGOP, I expressed support for the Congressional Records Protection Act, but it should go further. We should recognize that the Fourth Amendment requires judicial warrants to protect the privacy of all Americans.”
Massie also posted “The red vs blue AI political ads are going to be wild this fall. Here’s the AI ad the Israeli lobby spent millions to run against me in KY. Many older people voted against me because they believed I dated AOC and Omar. I told AOC I would never do that with Omar!”
Rep. Josh Gottheimer (R-NJ) posted “I had a chance to ask questions of the new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh today. I questioned him on: Will young Americans still be able to afford a mortgage now and in the future? The impact of AI on jobs, wages, and the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate. The rise of underage gambling on sports betting and prediction market apps. Whether federal deposit insurance levels should be increased across all banks.”
Gottheimer also (D-NJ) posted “AI is changing how millions of Americans access information — including about our elections. We can’t wait until misinformation spreads to act. That’s why RepMikeLawler and I are pushing the administration to take a coordinated approach to protect every American and make sure AI tools provide accurate, reliable election information.”
Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) posted “Artificial Intelligence can be a fantastic tool, but we have to use it right. Students using AI as a replacement for human interaction is a threat to their personal development. We can’t let this happen. My new bill, the Safeguard Kids Act, promotes AI literacy while protecting students through specialized counseling programs.”
Rep. Gil Cisneros (D-CA) posted “Small business owners deserve better guidance on how to use artificial intelligence. I co-sponsored the bipartisan AI WISE Act and AI For Main Street Act to address this need. These bills will require the SBA to develop artificial intelligence resources to help small business owners critically evaluate and adopt AI.”
Department of Health and Human Services Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) delivered remarks about the Department of Health and Human Services Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) model, saying, “This model inserts a black box computer algorithm into the decisions that should be being made by a physician and the patient. It puts a layer of bureaucracy between seniors and the care their doctors have recommended. I’m asking my colleagues to please get educated on how devastating this can be for individual lives and ask yourselves if you believe in traditional Medicare and the doctor-patient relationship. If you do, I guarantee you we will force this administration to stop using this A.I. tool to deny care for our seniors.” (Press release)
Senate Aging Committee Ranking Member Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said, “Allowing AI to continue to delay and deny seniors’ medical care is completely immoral and absolutely unacceptable. While Trump and Republicans focus on helping private insurers and big AI companies pad their profits, Democrats are committed to preventing unaccountable machines from blocking seniors’ access to timely medical care. I will not stop fighting until the WISeR model is abolished once and for all.” (Press release)
Senate Banking Committee Hearing on the Federal Reserve Semiannual Monetary Policy Report
Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA)
Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA): “The American economy is heavily leveraged on the success of artificial intelligence, and this is an issue that I’m very interested in—been engaging and talking to folks in the industry and folks outside of the industry, various stakeholders. According to a Bloomberg analysis, AI spending most recently climbed to about 8% of the U.S. gross domestic product, driving the country’s economic growth. Chair Warsh, you have long been bullish on AI. However, up to now, despite investors betting big on them, none of the major AI models have been meaningfully profitable. What are the consequences to our economy if none of these companies ever become profitable?
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh: “So, if they were to disappoint investors, I think the capital markets would dry up for them, and some of that capital investment would be curtailed.”
Warnock: “I guess that’s one way of putting it. I guess I’m getting at where ordinary folks are in the midst of that. The markets behind the markets are real people who have retirement savings and who are trying to make their present as well as their future work. American retirement accounts are increasingly tied to AI, and so there’s the human issue driven by massive increases in the stock prices of chip and AI companies. You might talk about the current markets in a way. It sort of—it is tall and narrow. Let’s imagine if we are in an AI bubble. What would happen to our economy, and more specifically, Americans’ retirement savings, if that bubble popped?”
Warsh: “So, I think it’s a fair question, Senator. I take it seriously. I’m not in the business of providing a Wall Street newsletter, but I’ll say broadly to your question about the effects on the economy: booms and busts do not help the real economy, and they don’t make the central bank’s job easier. What the central bank is trying to achieve is price stability—full employment—all in the context of financial stability. On the question of these AI companies, certainly the surge in their investment and the surge in their valuations is notable. But I’ll also note one other thing, Senator. Over the course of the last couple of months, we’ve seen the market cap—both of the public companies and of private companies—under some pressure at the overall indexes. We do seem to see a broadening out now. Why is that? Because earnings now for the last several quarters more broadly are moving up. I don’t want to suggest that should give us any complacency, but what the Fed’s looking for is economic strength to broaden and the inflation that we talked about earlier to become more narrow.”
Warnock: “So, I’d be worried about a massive economic slowdown. You know, the impact of Wall Street on Main Street, and I’d be worried about job losses. Stock prices tumbling would mean Americans could not retire as planned, and I don’t want to see taxpayers holding the bag should this AI bubble pop. I’m not against AI. AI is not going anywhere. It has both promise and peril. I just want us to be thinking critically about this from all angles. Earlier this month, you announced a new task force to assess the effect of AI on productivity and jobs. The three individuals you chose for the task force are tech executives who have directly worked for or with AI labs. All three of them. Yes or no, will the Fed include anyone on this task force with an alternative viewpoint on AI? For example, anyone who represents the workers whose lives may be up ended by increased adoption of AI tools and technology?”
Warsh: “So, Senator, it’s a fair question. As I mentioned to your colleague a few moments ago, what I’d say is one of the people on those task forces is an academic. Now I don’t want to suggest that the academic is representing some…”
Warnock: “You don’t want to suggest that the academic is being academic—”
Warsh: “—I don’t want to suggest that, but this isn’t a faculty lounge discussion. What I do want to suggest is that academic’s work has spent a lot of time talking about prior technology shocks and the displacement that it has on labor. The assurance I can give you is that these three people on that task force, like the other task forces, they’re not the deciders. You’retalking to one of the deciders. The 19 of us around the FOMC with a breadth of backgrounds and interest, we’re going to decide what we think of their conclusions.”
Warnock: “As a decision maker, I always want various viewpoints. I certainly have nothing against an academic expertise. I think you know that that’s important, and it’s too often ignored in some of the appointments that we’ve seen around here lately. But here’s my problem: Americans are worried about what AI will mean for the economy, and I’m worried that this viewpoint isn’t represented at the Fed.”
Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE)
Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE): “One of the things that you shared in your testimony was about the task forces that you have established, which I think is a really good idea. And I think the choices of things that you’re focused on, from communication to AI and the influence, all of those things are really important. On the AI [task force] in particular, I hope that there will be the inclusion of other voices beyond economic experts and tech individuals, but actually families, businesses, people that are both consuming and impacted by AI. If you could talk a little bit more about the makeup of that one in particular, and how you will include people both in the task force, and how you will include Main Street in your ongoing work at the Fed?”
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh: “We have 15 people across five task forces. I think there’s a breadth of views, perspectives, expertise. They’re all fantastic. They aren’t decision makers, you’re talking to one of the ultimate decision makers, and I believe like you do in the reserve banks. The Reserve Bank Presidents bring a breadth of views from their communities, from their businesses, and they are going to be the deciders about what to do with these. I don’t want you to think that I’ve outsourced anything to these task forces other than coming up with new ideas.”
House Financial Services Committee Hearing on the Federal Reserve Semiannual Monetary Policy Report
Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA)
Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA): “I was pleased to see that in your opening remarks you you spoke to the issue of artificial intelligence, and as the Ranking Member on AI and crypto, I was just curious to try to get tease some more of your thoughts out on that, you know, not not only in the financial services context, but AI in general. I mean, in the past, the Federal Reserve has been able to identify risks of impact to the to the financial system, but also in a wider context as well. And I wonder if you’d share some of your concerns about that. And I guess I’d like to know, under your leadership, what will be what will be the Fed’s approach on AI and how you protect the system from some of the risks that may be attendant to the adoption of AI.”
Kevin Warsh: “Yeah, thank you, Congressman. We talked about this a bit in your office, and I appreciate the time. This is perhaps the most significant change in our economy in my adult lifetime. I take the new investments in intelligence, in some sense, to be one where we have to recognize it’s a huge opportunity, but it also comes with risks and challenges. It is not the job of the central bank to provide or be certain of what the consequences are over the next 2012, or 24 months. But we recognize that the United States is likely to be a big winner. The United States is at the forefront of these technologies, both the human capital and the capital provided from investors are happening here. So the efficient frontier of these technologies are happening in the United States. This is a benefit broadly to our economy, but I don’t want to sound overly complacent about it. These technologies also offer threats when they find their way into adversaries’ hands. The infrastructure at the Federal Reserve, the infrastructure at our banks, large and small, they must feel new pressure as people are looking to use these technologies to do harm, so these technologies can use can be used for good and for harm over the long term. I think the US is the winner over the long term. I think there is a material improvement in productivity, which should have a material improvement ultimately in wages and the strength of the economy. But the long term is can be quite far out, and we’ve got to monitor things month by month, quarter by quarter, as we get there.”
Lynch: “Yeah, the the the thing that troubles me is every time we talk about AI I hear about this race, and it’s us against China, or it’s us against South Korea, or countries in the EU. the The problem with that thinking is that in this race, and we’re seeing the velocity of change is is enormous. It’s exceeding obviously our ability to regulate AI. At the end of the day, I don’t see the United States as the winner. I don’t see China as the winner. I see a, you know, artificial superintelligence as the winner. That’s where we’re rushing along this course, and at the end of the day, we’re creating either us, and it doesn’t matter whether the creator of artificial superintelligence is a good guy or a bad guy, or a a good gal or a bad gal? That super intelligence itself will be the entity that we have to confront, and I just worry about the broader impact of what’s going on right now. There’s tremendous resources, as you know, being poured into AI. I just hope that the course of regulation does not meet the same fate that the regulation of crypto did, where the crypto industry spent close to 250 million dollars up here on Capitol Hill, and they got the bill they wanted. If that happens, if that happens with AI we are in serious, not only in this country but in this world. And I do believe that the Fed, your position, has influence, has the ability to to seek out those dangers that others may not identify, and I just ask you to please consider your role and the resources that you have. That maybe you can put a task force together to look at the broader implications of this, the adoption of AI. They can’t even. Show us-they can’t even explain some of the things that they’re using right now. The explainability gap is enormous, but I welcome you.”
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Hearing on the Nomination of Jay Clayton for Director of National Intelligence
Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD)
Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD): “I want to give you an opportunity to talk a little bit about some of the new technologies that are being involved that we’re going to have to address. And I don’t think we’ve really talked a lot about what artificial intelligence is going to do, and the integration of artificial intelligence not just by by our intelligence agencies but also by our adversaries, and the focus that we’re going to have to have on the amount of data that we collect and how we’re going to have to organize that. Can I? I know that you’re brand new into this discussion and that you’re going to be learning it at a at a high rate of speed, but can you talk a little bit about your concepts about how we take this huge amount of data that we’ve got and organize it, integrate it in such a fashion that it’s available to be able to make an analysis and to give the best advice to the leaders of this country. We talk about how you see the integration of AI into this process.”
Jay Clayton: “Thank you. Let me start by saying, talking about it in an area where I know, which is a huge data area, which is the way our markets operate, and and the resiliency of our markets, and what I would say is their their vulnerability to attack and AI is a game changer, and we should just all recognize that. I think I think I commend the Treasury Secretary for for leading the way in this, and and the Federal Reserve in calling the banks in to talk about what that means, I expect it’s the same, or at least it resonates in the intelligence community that that AI is not only an opportunity but a threat. When something’s both an opportunity and a threat, you better get your arms around it.”
Rounds: “Yeah. Look, the reason why I ask the question that way is, is I think that that AI is it not only is a game changer, but it it’s going to be seen by the American public first of all as a threat, because they’re going to see on social media they’re going to see the misinformation that comes out, deep fakes and so forth. But the other side of it, which is the quality of life that Americans are going to be able to receive because of improvements in our productivity and so forth, is going to far outweigh what the the negative benefit or the negative implications are. But along with that comes the ability for our country to be able to gather huge amounts of data, a lot of which is is going to be of concern to the American people because it’s going to be information on them, and they’re going to be concerned that government is collecting information on them, while at the same time, government, the IC community in particular, has to be able to collect information not so much on American people, but on the threats worldwide, and I think this is going to cause people to say, Okay, are you collecting data on us, or are you collecting data on the rest of the world? And how do you separate that? A lot of that has to do with a lot of the discussion regarding 702 and FISA and so forth, and I and artificial intelligence is just simply going to magnify that. Can we talk about how we approach that? Because we need the artificial intelligence. We need to be better than our adversaries. Collect more data, collect it faster, analyze it better. But we still have to have those protections and the confidence of the American people that we’re doing the right things with only the data that we’re supposed to be collecting, I think will add will allow us to continue to move and to protect them. Can we talk about how we do that and how you see that, please?”
Jay Clayton: “Well, I think the first thing is exactly what you said, Senator Rounds, recognizing that an issue that we’re dealing with, I think pretty well, but can always get better, is you know, collect the data we need to provide a good intelligence product, without without violating people’s Fourth Amendment rights, but also in the in the in a way that we can control and monitor that. I expect it’s just what you said that AI is going to mat is going to greatly amplify that collection ability, which amplifies the need for oversight and controls to protect our citizens. I think I think we should just recognize that that’s the case.”
Rounds: “Yep. Thank you. Look, Ms. Chairman, I I just think that this is something that I I think our committee is going to be directly involved with, and I I think on both sides of the aisle the the implementation of this tool as we speed up the delivery of the, of the decision-making capabilities for our leaders, has got to be one that the American people will continue to have confidence in, and I think that’s part of the key reasons for having a discussion like this is to let people know that we recognize that that that threat is out there and that we’re aware of it, and that as we collect the data that we have to, we’re going to be very careful about the the coordination so that their rights are protected in this collection process.”
House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Operations Hearing on “Emerging Fraud Threats and the Evolving Fraud Landscape”
Subcommittee Chair Pete Sessions (R-TX)
Chair Pete Sessions: “I brought up my circumstance of talking [about] Social Security, how they vetted me, how they talked to me about things that I would know about myself that not a lot of people would understand. Is this the kind of fair game that would be used to vet people on a regular basis? And how can we cross-get this type of information to where if you’re at SBA, you may or may not have that available to you? If you’re at Social Security, you probably could ask some detailed questions about working history, about doing other things. Do we need to expand or develop some way for agencies that take a new request from a person? It could be about, not [Veterans Affairs], because you could ask about those questions, but about someone who’s recently unemployed and asking about a depth of knowledge. How do we really help those agencies to make the determination, even when speaking to a person?”
Dr. David Maimon, Head of Fraud Insights, SentiLink: “This is a great question, Mr. Chairman and I agree with your statement. I think, let me go back to my career as a sociology in the Ohio State University, the first class in the degree we were taught about the difference between ‘gemeinschaft’ and ‘gesellschaft’—’community and society.’ The reason why I’m bringing this important distinction is that in the past, here in the United States or any other place, when you went into the bank or to the IRS and asked for opening a new bank account or a loan or getting some governmental benefits, the guy sitting across from you knew who you were. He knew your family. He knew where you worked. He knew your history, so to speak. And so they were able to assess the risk you pose to the organization more effectively. Now, you know, we’re at this point in a point of a society…What they will not be able to fake is the historical evidence. And that that goes as well to the AI solutions out there, right? I mean, AI will be able to give you an amazing picture of a person who does not exist, or AI will be able to take my face and bring it to life when I’m abroad, so to speak, and try and authenticate me when I’m trying to get unemployment benefits. But one thing that AI tools will not be able to do at this point is to create the historical signals around me or around anyone who is trying to identify themselves. And I think that is where the solution lies, being able to find solutions which will allow us to look at historical evidence around individuals, around their name, date of birth, addresses, telephone numbers, and make assessment with respect to whether they are who they say they are.” (Press release)
Rep. Brian Jack (R-GA)
Rep. Brian Jack (R-GA): “Mr. Burris, my first question is for you. The public increasingly relies on the internet to access government services. And I’m just curious, from your perspective, what fraud threats might my constituents be facing that they’re not even aware of yet?”
Jordan Burris, Vice President and Head of Public Sector, Socure: “Representative, thank you for the question. When it comes to the fraud threats in the way that they’re evolving across the landscape, every single interaction, every single time that an individual is engaging both with their government and in their commercial life, there is the chance, the opportunity, that an adversary could be attempting to pose as them [or] could be attempting to enroll in an account. We see this across financial services where we work. We see this across various aspects of the gig economy where we work, and then, of course, with government organizations, the reality here is that all of the information, all the PII that exists for many folks within this room has been stolen by the adversary. And they are using that to attempt to become them, and therefore that they can access what would be either their bank accounts and help move money all across the economy.”
Jack: “You know, I’ve heard folks mention anecdotally that now with artificial intelligence, people are trying to impersonate, you know, a loved one by virtue of maybe their voice or their mannerisms, what have you. And using some of that information that may have been stolen. Have you seen that? And could you elaborate on that for us?”
Burris: “Yeah, absolutely. We are in a what I would consider a national crisis from where I’ve highlighted, and our team has highlighted. Socure, for a number of years now [has said] that the moment that we’re in is unlike any other in the sense that AI is being used as an accelerator for attacks that typically would take weeks to occur. Further, it’s also becoming more cost effective for the adversary to launch those attacks. These attacks could be everything from launching deepfakes, things where we’ve seen an 8,000 percent increase year over year. This can also be in terms of the velocity by which attacks are happening. This means the speed by which they are occurring. And in these instances, these moments we are seeing things that where attacks used to take weeks in order to be conducted, they have been broken down to under 48 hours. And this would mean that an adversary has launched an attack where they have stolen my information, or yours, or even worse, fabricated an identity attempt to open an account and or move money, take over an account that may have existed because they went through a call center and were pretending to be you, using your voice or something that was cloned, an image of yours, biometric, etcetera. And they’ve used all these patterns, and if, say, they were blocked in some way, shape or form, they then just adapt and iterate, and the cycle continues all over again.” (Press release)
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Hearing on the Nomination of Keith Sonderling for Secretary of Labor
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO)
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO): “It’s great to see you here. Let me start with something you and I talked about then, and that we talked about last time you were before this committee, which is artificial intelligence and the effect that that’s going to have on the job market. The St. Louie Federal Reserve recently issued a report in which they said we may be witnessing the early stages of AI-driven job displacement, the IMF International Monetary Fund estimates that 40% of jobs, at least worldwide, are exposed to AI so could suffer from AI job displacement. My question to you is this What do we need to be doing as a government, and more specifically, what does DOL need to be doing now to be getting our workers in the country, ready for the impacts of AI and maybe more importantly, helping them keep their jobs, use whatever artificial intelligence is going to be integrated into the workplace to improve their productivity and their wages. I mean, should we be able to agree that the goal here ought to be not to lose jobs? We don’t want that. We want to see wages go up. We want to see more opportunities for workers. How are we going to get there?”
Keith Sonderling: “We want to see more jobs in this, and there is the potential to do that. And this is where really this administration is taking this very seriously, both from a national competitive perspective, but also from a workforce development side. You know, we’re working very closely with the National Science Foundation and the Department of Education to develop that AI curriculum that China has, and they’re teaching them in the second grade, and we’re not doing that. But how do we get that curriculum? How do we actually teach? If you teach somebody on AI right now, in two months it may be outdated. So that’s really where the partnership of where we’re trying to take to get that education, to get that curriculum into the education system. We need to be talking to the employers and the tech companies who are employers who are buying this, and the tech companies who are designing this, and and that’s where the issue has been not getting that information from them, not having those partnerships, and not sharing them. And that’s what I’m trying to solve. We’re launching the AI Action Work Hub, which is allowing us now to enter into MOUs with both tech developers and companies who are deploying this to number one see what the real impacts are, see how these programs are being designed to backtrack that number one into the education system, but more importantly to make sure that American workers and students have those baseline skills they need. Because right now you have kids in high school, you have kids in middle school who think they’re not going to have a job, and you have employees who think they’re going to lose their job. So the fear on both parts is not helping anybody, and to be able to get rid of that fear, we need to have education. To be able to get that education, we need the information from these companies designing it. So we’ve been able to enter into MOUs, and we want the Bureau of Labor Statistics to take this over, get them that information, so they can actually see if it’s job loss, job augmentation, to be there to help them on both sides,”
Hawley: “You anticipate what I want to ask you about next, which is, isn’t it important? It seems to me it’s important that we get all the data we can about AI job impacts in terms of jobs it’s creating, jobs it is costing, how it is being integrated into the workforce. Senator Warner and I have a bill that would do this, co-sponsored by various members of this committee. But what would be even better is if DOL would would do this on its own accord. You and I talked about steps you’re already taking. Maybe tell us that for the record. What are you doing in terms of collecting this information that I think is vital for us to know what is really happening with AI and the workforce?”
Sonderling: “We’re trying to control the narrative from the doom and gloom that’s out there, which is largely consultant driven. It’s largely tech company driven saying we have these products that’s going to eliminate 10,000 workers. How does that make the American worker feel? And we don’t even know if businesses are actually implementing this, or these tools can actually do what they say they’re trying to do. So that’s where we’re really trying to get that information. And what we believe is we’re going to see is that AI impacted jobs can potentially make you more productive. It can make your work. Place is safer, but we can’t get that information yet. So we have MOUs. We’re part of our AI action plan, and we’re getting that data from Fortune 500 companies. We’re getting from tech companies. We’re getting it from unions, and we’re going to take that data and for the first time have BLS look at it and say, Well, here’s where the impact actually is, and more importantly, here’s what you need to do, DOL, to get money to the state workforce agencies, to get money through the Department of Education to train those workers, that’s never happened before. The second part, we just issued an RFI last week through BLS to have the time study that BLS does include AI. So now they’re going to ask people how much AI do you use at home, how much AI do you use at work. So in the meantime, before we get it from the employers and tech companies, we’re going to get it from the American workers who are being impacted instantly, and we’ll be able to see what they’re doing.”
Hawley: “Good, that’s good. We need that data. We need it in order to make informed choices, and I think we’ve got a lot of hard choices to make with regard to AI.”
What I’m Reading This Week
Behind the Curtain: AI Godfathers Converge on Regulations, Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, Axios
A Framework for Frontier AI and the Dawning of a New Age, Demis Hassabis.
About Zero One Strategies
Zero One Strategies is a specialized government relations practice dedicated to navigating the complex landscape of U.S. federal policy in emerging technologies. As advancements in technology continue to outpace regulatory frameworks, Zero One Strategies aims to provide strategic guidance and bipartisan advocacy for innovators and businesses operating at the forefront of technological development.
The practice focuses on key areas such as artificial intelligence, digital assets, blockchain, decentralized technologies, cybersecurity, data, and digital infrastructure, as well as the multiple policy issues impacting these sectors, including tax and financial services.
Contact us at Stacey@ZeroOneStrategies.com
Check out our other newsletter, DC Decentralized: A weekly newsletter on developments in digital asset and blockchain federal policy
