December 8, 2025: This week in AI federal policy

DC/ai Decoded: A weekly newsletter on AI federal policy

This week decoded

The controversial state AI moratorium is no longer under consideration within the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) told reporters the NDAA “wasn’t the best place for this to fit” and that House Republican leaders are “still looking at other places” to attach the proposal. Of the provision’s future, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said, “That’s controversial. I think the White House is working with senators and House members…to try and come up with something that works but preserves states’ rights.” The GAIN AI Act, limiting the export of advanced AI chips to countries like China, is also reportedly out of the final NDAA text.

CISA, in collaboration with international cybersecurity agencies, released new guidance for critical infrastructure operators deploying AI. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to release a new national cybersecurity strategy in January, possibly followed by an executive order to implement the new strategy.

Read more below

Congress

Hearings

Last week

• On December 2, the Senate Foreign Relations East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy Subcommittee holds a hearing on Countering China’s Challenge to American AI Leadership.

This week

• On December 9, the Senate Judiciary Intellectual Property Subcommittee holds a hearing on Balancing the Interests of Local Radio, Songwriters, and Performers in the Digital Age.

• On December 10, the House Financial Services Committee holds a hearing on From Principles to Policy: Enabling 21st Century AI Innovation in Financial Services.

• On December 10, the House Science, Space and Technology Committee holds a hearing on the Genesis Mission: Prioritizing American Science and Technology Leadership.

Upcoming

• On December 17, the House Homeland Security holds a Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Subcommittee and Oversight, Investigations and Accountability Subcommittee holds a hearing following a report about an AI-assisted, partially autonomous cyberattack against the U.S. company Anthropic by a state-sponsored cyber actor backed by China.

Legislation

• Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) introduced a bill to require the National Academy of Sciences to establish a grant program to develop safe AI models and safe AI research. (Text)

• Sens. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Adam Schiff (D-CA) introduced a bill to promote a 21st century workforce, to authorize grants to support emerging and advanced technology education, and to support training and quality employment for workers in industries most impacted by artificial intelligence. (Text)

• Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) and Jim Banks (R-IN) introduced the Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out prize competitions to advance the science of interpretability and to develop adversarial robustness with respect to artificial intelligence products, and for other purposes. (Text)

• Sens. Jim Banks (R-IN), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), and Jon Husted (R-OH introduced the AI Workforce PREPARE Act to better forecast and plan for the impact of artificial intelligence on the workforce of the United States and to provide data to improve training programs for in-demand industry sectors and occupations. (Text)

• Sens. John Curtis (R-UT) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced a bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require disclosures with respect to robocalls using artificial intelligence and to provide for enhanced penalties for certain violations involving artificial intelligence voice or text message impersonation. (Text)

• Reps. Sarah McBride (D-DE) and Jay Obernolte (R-CA) introduced the READ AI Models Act to direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop best practices and technical guidance on artificial intelligence model documentation. (Text)

• Reps. Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Chris Deluzio (D-PA), and James Moylan (R-GU) introduced the No Robot Bosses Act to prohibit employers from relying exclusively on automated decision systems when making employment-related decisions, add protections for job applicants and employees, and require employers to train users on responsible system management and disclose when and how these systems are being used. (Text)

• Reps. Tom Kean (R-NJ), Julie Johnson (D-TX), Lisa McClain (R-MI), and Josh Harder (D-CA) and House Select Committee on China Chair John Moolenaar (R-MI) and Ranking Member Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) introduced the Stop Stealing Our Chips Act to establish a whistleblower incentive program at the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) to support U.S. export control enforcement and reporting of export control violations.
  The companion Senate bill was introduced in April 2025 by Sens. Mike Rounds (R-SD) and Mark Warner (D-VA). (Press release)

• Sens. Ed Markey (D-MA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) reintroduced the AI Civil Rights Act to establish protections for individual rights with respect to computational algorithms. Reps. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) Summer Lee (D-PA), Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) introduced the House companion bill. (Text)

• Reps. Greg Landsman (D-OH) and Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ) introduced the Ban AI Denials in Medicare Act to prohibits the implementation of the WISeR model. (Text)

• Reps. Celeste Maloy (R-UT) and Jake Auchincloss (D-MA) introduced the Deepfake Liability Act to amend Section 230 by conditioning a platform’s liability protections on meeting a clear duty of care and clarifying that AI-generated content does not qualify for Section 230 immunity. (Press release)

• Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT) introduced the Growth, Energy, and National Excellence through Science, Innovation, and Security Act (GENESIS Act) to codify President Donald J. Trump’s newly signed Executive Order launching the Genesis Mission. (Text)

• Sens. Pete Ricketts (R-NE), Chris Coons (D-DE), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Dave McCormick (R-PA), and Andy Kim (D-NJ) introduced the Secure and Feasible Exports (SAFE) Chips Act of 2025 to codify the Trump Administration’s current limits on which advanced AI chips are allowed to be sold to China. (Text)

• Rep. Erin Houchin (R-IN) introduced a bill to ensure that providers of chatbots clearly and conspicuously disclose to users who are minors that chatbots are artificial intelligence systems, not natural person, and do not provide advice from licensed professionals. (Text)

Correspondence

• Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) and Joni Ernst (R-IA) sent a letter to National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross requesting he take action after Chinese state-sponsored hackers reportedly used artificial intelligence (AI) systems to conduct cyberattacks. (Letter)

• Reps. Deborah Ross (D-NC). Alma Adams (NC-12), Julia Bownley (D-CA), Valerie Foushee (D-NC), Kim Schrier (D-WA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Melanie Stansbury (D-NM), and Jill Tokuda (D-HI) sent a letter urging Speaker Mike Johnson and Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries to reject any effort to include a broad moratorium on state and local artificial intelligence regulation in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) or any other unrelated legislative vehicle. (Letter)

• Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) and 43 colleagues sent a letter to House and Senate Armed Services Committee leadership urging the exclusion of any moratorium or preemption on state Artificial Intelligence laws in the FY26 NDAA. (Letter)

Publications and Events

• Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) published an op-ed in The Guardian entitled “AI Poses Unprecedented Threats. Congress Must Act Now,” saying, “Despite the extraordinary importance of this issue and the speed at which it is progressing, AI is getting far too little discussion in Congress, the media and within the general population. That has got to change. Now. Several months ago, as the ranking member of the US Senate committee on health, education, labor and pensions, I undertook an investigation regarding the monumental challenges that we face with the rapid development of artificial intelligence…Based on our investigation and other information that we are gathering, my staff and I will soon be presenting a very specific set of recommendations to Congress as to how we can begin addressing some of the unprecedented threats that AI poses.” (Op-ed)

Trump Administration

Department of Energy (DOE)

• DOE issued a Request for Information (RFI) regarding Partnerships for Transformational Artificial Intelligence Models and how DOE should best structure and enable partnerships to curate DOE scientific data across the National Laboratory complex for use in artificial intelligence models. The RFI also seeks input on using this data to develop self-improving AI models for science and engineering to advance scientific discovery, energy, and national security. Responses are due by January 14, 2026. (Federal Register)

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

• NIST will hold a meeting of the Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board on January 21-22 to discuss agentic artificial intelligence security. (Register)

Department of Commerce

• Commerce has extended the comment period until December 13, 2025 for the request for information (RFI) relating to the American AI Exports Program published October 28, 2025. The RFI seeks information on the request for proposals that Commerce will issue pursuant to Executive Order 14320, “Promoting the Export of the American AI Technology Stack.” (Federal Register)

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

• HHS released its AI Strategy to make artificial intelligence available to the federal workforce, integrating it across internal operations, research, and public health. (Strategy)

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)

• CISA, in collaboration with international partners, released new cybersecurity guidance to help critical infrastructure owners and operators integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into operational technology systems, entitled “Principles for the Secure Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Operational Technology.” (Principles)

• The Trump Administration is planning to release a new national cybersecurity strategy in January, possibly followed by an executive order to implement the new strategy. The strategy would resemble a messaging document with six pillars on cyber offense and deterrence; aligning regulations to make them more uniform; bolstering the cyber workforce; federal procurement; critical infrastructure protection; and emerging technologies. (Cyberscoop)

Noteworthy Quotes and Events

CONGRESS

State AI Moratorium

• House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said, “The NDAA is always an important bill, but it’s a bill that you have to build a separate coalition on. We’re still looking at other places, because there’s still an interest.” (Punchbowl)

• On Republican leadership removing the state AI moratorium provision from the National Defense Authorization Act, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) posted, “Good. This is a terrible provision and should remain OUT.”

• Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) posted, “There should not be a moratorium on states rights for AI. States must retain the right to regulate and make laws on AI and everything else for the benefit of their state. Federalism must be preserved.”

• Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-WA) said, “…we need to make sure that we don’t outsource AI regulation to California or to Brussels. If we allow each state to do it, because California is the largest market, Gavin Newsom and the radical leftists in California will have a significant impact on what happens with artificial intelligence, and this is a race against China.” He also said, “If California stifles innovation, that will have national security implications. You’ve seen where Europeans have regulated the internet heavily, and you’ve had limits on growth; there’s almost no growth there. If we don’t have some preemption, you are giving that power to Gavin Newsom…I am certainly a free market, states’ rights legislator, but coming from a left-wing state like Washington, I’ve seen what can happen when there is a state like California….interstate commerce has to be regulated by Congress, and AI is interstate commerce.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Vince Fong (R-CA) said, “The focus of why we are trying to put a national framework in place is because blue states like California are messing it up. We have state legislators who are trying to inhibit a hugely beneficial technology; look at quantum and the other technologies out there. If we allow states like California to overregulate, we’ll never see the benefits.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA) said states that “regulate any part of the economy at the drop of a hat overreaching and going too far on this. Some kind of federal preemption could be helpful to the markets and to the development of AI.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Jim Baird (R-IN) said, “AI is coming along so fast and it’s growing exponentially, so it’s wise to use the opportunity to set some guardrails to provide guidance to the states. I’m glad states are taking initiative to try and resolve some of this. AI can be a tremendous boon to solve medical problems, complex issues, and yet there is the concern about the nefarious uses of that technology. It’s very good to have the discussion.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-IN) said, “We need a national framework; we don’t want a patchwork of policies on AI, especially having states like California set the agenda. America needs to be the leader, not California.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Troy Downing (R-MT) said, “Look at California, where insurance companies are leaving the state. My problem with a federal law is that Montana’s laws aren’t going to be the law, and California’s aren’t going to be the law. I understand the hesitation that large companies have, but I know that Montana is going to do what’s right for Montana, and I don’t want them to be subject to the whims of California.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC) said he has “concerns about the patchwork quilt that’s done with all the states.” He added it is “important to have states look at it. I don’t know that the federal government has the answers to this.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL) said his top priority is “put[ting] guardrails on to protect our kids…There’s something we have to do from a federal level to prevent young kids from being targeted by predators online in blue states.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Tracey Mann (R-KS) said, “We need to make sure that AI flourishes and prospers in the U.S. and not overseas, so we have to make sure that we do not overregulate it to our detriment and to the benefit of China, Russia, and North Korea.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Mark Alford (R-MO) said, “We need some guardrails, just like we did with crypto. We have to win the AI game when it comes to our adversaries like China, in particular. But we have to make sure that we have the parameters in place so that we can do it effectively, judiciously, and promote invention, productivity, and winning when it comes to the AI race.” (Washington Reporter)

• Rep. Laura Friedman (D-CA) posted “I stood up and helped stop an AI regulation ban that House Republicans tried to sneak into the Big, Ugly Bill earlier this year. Now the Trump administration is trying to override Congress & enforce a ban through executive order. States need to be able to set commonsense guardrails to protect Americans from predatory AI practices & we will keep fighting to keep that power in the hands of the people.”

• Rep. Rob Menendez (D-NJ) posted “A blanket ban on state AI laws would stop New Jersey from advancing responsible AI regulation and derail the common-sense guardrails we’re already leading on. Proud to join my colleagues in opposing this last-minute Republican push to add an AI moratorium into the NDAA that would shut down any progress states have already made.”

• Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) posted “Trump and Republicans are trying to BAN states from regulating AI by slipping a ban into any bill they can. So if WA state, or any state for that matter, wants to protect kids, protect people’s privacy, or protect their jobs—they’ll have their hands tied. No way.”

Miscellaneous

• In Senate floor remarks, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said, “It’s no secret to any of us that China is our near peer competitor, and they don’t have -- they don’t have benign intentions with regard to the United States. They want to dominate the United States, economically and militarily. And they’ve threatened President Xi, the head of the People’s Republic of China and the Communist Party, have threatened time after time after time to forcibly attack Taiwan and to consolidate Taiwan with mainland China. We also know that the battle for the future of the world would literally be determined by who wins the race on artificial intelligence, which is heavily reliant on the production of advanced semiconductors and other advanced microelectronics. These technologies, and this is really important, they have both commercial and military applications. But in China, anything that’s developed or possessed by a commercial entity has to be shared with the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army. They call that military and civilian fusion, admissibility-civil fusion. It means any progress they make, including on something as sophisticated and cutting-edge as artificial intelligence, has to be shared, and will be shared, with their military. On Tuesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy held a hearing on China’s challenge to America’s leadership when it comes to artificial intelligence. We heard expert testimony from four witnesses on the challenges that the United States faces in staying ahead of China in this critical sector. Each of these witnesses emphasize the importance of export controls, controlling what technology goes from the United States into China, where they can then use that to compete with us and potentially even beat us in the A.I. race. One quoted a senior executive at a Chinese AI firm, who said that Chinese companies have to use two to four times the computing power to achieve the same results for large model training because of U.S. restrictions on AI chips. Now, this is a good thing. However, export controls, while an effective tool, are not simple nor straightforward, and the Chinese government is really good, like the Russians, at circumventing sanctions and different restrictions, in this case on cutting-edge technology. The U.S. must take care to ensure our export controls are properly enforced as PRC shell companies have ways of working around these trade controls in order to acquire American semiconductors and other control products. Unfortunately, sometimes it seems like a game of whack-a-mole, because one company will pop its head up, and we’ll deal with that. But then they change the name, and it’s the same thing under a different name. It’s not just the chips themselves that we have to keep a tight grip on but the machinery used to make them.”

• In remarks at the Center for American Progress, Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) said US policy needs “clear enforceable standards to make sure AI respects civil rights, protects privacy and [we] don’t leave people behind. That includes strong transparency requirements, accountability mechanisms and international coordination, so that our values — not those of some authoritarian regime out there — shape the future of this technology.” He also said, “We have to strengthen our infrastructure and we have to support smart, responsible laws that keep this technology safe and true to our values, because American leadership doesn’t happen by accident.” (AI Scoop)

• Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) posted “A fact that should scare the shit out of us: unemployment among recent college grads is already at 9%, and it could get up to 25% in the coming years. We need to get ready for serious and painful changes in the job market due to AI.”

• Warner also posted “AI is one of the most significant innovations of our time, but we must be proactive in ensuring it doesn’t lead to an economic cliff.”

• Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) posted “RFK Jr. is praising private insurers for removing prior authorization while he is ramping up a pilot program requiring AI-led prior authorization for Medicare patients in 6 states, including WA state, which will delay and deny care for seniors. No AI prior authorization. No way.”

• Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE) posted “The United States leads the AI race with Communist China due in large part to our dominance of global compute power. At the core of compute are advanced AI chips. The best AI chips are made by American companies. Denying Beijing access to these AI chips is essential to our national security. Codifying President Trump’s current AI chip limitations on Communist China secures this goal. It will allow U.S. chip companies to continue to rapidly innovate and widen our compute lead exponentially.”

• Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE) posted, “What if everyone using AI—from school districts to small businesses to local governments—could easily create and access nutrition labels for different AI models that clearly lay out information to help inform their safety, performance, and risks? That’s exactly what my bipartisan Resources for Evaluating and Documenting (READ) AI Models Act would do. It would help level the playing field so small and medium-sized developers as well as users can make informed, responsible choices about the models they create and rely on. That’s what transparency is all about.”

• Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) posted “We’re taking action to protect America’s AI leadership and ensure our most advanced chips don’t end up in the hands of the CCP. That’s why I’m introducing the SAFE CHIPS Act with SenatorRicketts to strengthen U.S. innovation and national security.”

• Coons also posted “The United States must not sell advanced AI chips to China, plain and simple. The world’s foremost experts on AI, Republican and Democrat, unanimously agree.”

• Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) posted “If Trump and Republicans want to do nothing to protect kids, then states are going to do it. We need federal standards to regulate AI.”

• Rep. Donald Norcross (D-NJ) posted “Medicare should help seniors get care, not deny it. This new AI experiment could put more barriers between patients and their doctors, and New Jersey seniors deserve better. I’ll keep fighting to protect their access to the care they need.”

• Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) posted “Until Congress addresses the dire threat of algorithmic bias, Americans will continue to rely on their states to protect them from the many potential harms of unregulated AI and its unrestrained Big Tech masters. That’s why I led 43 of my colleagues in a letter to the leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services Committee urging them to exclude anything resembling an AI Moratorium from the FY26 NDAA.”

• Rep. Pat Fallon (R-TX) posted “North Korea used American payrolls to fund their weapons programs. As threats become more sophisticated and AI accelerates enemy capabilities, half measures will not cut it. Cybersecurity is national security and it’s time to act like it.”

• Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) posted “As artificial intelligence technology evolves, it’s crucial that Inland Empire students and our workforce have the tools they need to keep up. I’m proud to announce $1 million in funding to ensure that CSUSB and UCR students can gain a world-class education in AI.”

• Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) posted “I was proud to stand with SenMarkey, RepYvetteClarke, RepSummerLee, & RepPressley to introduce our AI Civil Rights Act. As giant corporations & billionaires use algorithms to discriminate against people like you & me, Congress must pass this legislation to protect Americans.”

• Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) posted “Technology does not exist above our society. It reflects every bias and inequality that has yet to be fixed. That’s exactly why we need our AI Civil Rights Act to ensure no one is harmed by innovation that discriminates or leaves them behind.”

• House Energy and Commerce Committee posted “American AI dominance is non-negotiable. If America doesn’t lead the world, we risk letting China win the AI race. That’s why HouseCommerce is working every single day to help the U.S. beat China and continue our leadership.”

• Rep. Troy Downing (R-MT) posted “The AI revolution is coming whether we like it or not. Small businesses need the tools to not only keep pace, but harness this transformational technology. Great conversation with RepScholten about our bipartisan AI-WISE Act to do just that.”

• Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-MI) posted “AI is changing the way we work and do business, and small businesses deserve the tools to keep up and compete. I had a great conversation with my colleague RepTroyDowning about our bipartisan AI-WISE Act, which helps small businesses harness this technology in a smart, responsible way.”

• Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) posted “I commend SecKennedy and the HHSGov team for developing this strategy to utilize AI technologies and better serve taxpayers. This is the kind of innovative leadership that will help restore faith in government and improve health outcomes.”

• Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) posted “Threats to our power grid are growing, whether from state actors like Russia or China, or domestic terrorists here at home, whose capabilities are enhanced every day by increasingly effective AI. Today in EnergyCommerce I’m fighting to address these threats – and ensure we have a fully staffed ENERGY Dept to combat them.”

• Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-WA) posted “Beginning in January, private companies will start using AI to review certain health care services, potentially delaying or denying Medicare beneficiaries from getting the care they’ve earned. I introduced legislation to stop this program. Health decisions should be made between patients & their doctors, not profit-driven algorithms.”

• Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE) posted “As AI continues to disrupt our economy, it’s absolutely essential we protect workers and lay the groundwork for future success. Proud to be leading proactive legislation with maziehirono and SenAdamSchiff to make sure innovation and supporting our workforce go hand in hand.”

• Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) posted “NVIDIA’s CEO spent the past year lobbying Trump to greenlight the sale of advanced AI chips to China, which could undercut US national security. Now he’s heading to Capitol Hill to push his agenda in secret meetings. Huang should testify publicly.”

• Rep. Greg Landsman (R-OH) posted “This administration wants to pay AI companies to deny healthcare for seniors. We introduced a bill with @RepBonnie to stop this dangerous program and protect Medicare patients.”

• Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ) posted “AI has the potential to unlock a new age of human flourishing. Using AI to deny medicare recipients their needed coverage is a perverse use of this technology and is yet another example of the Trump Administration cow-towing to his billionaire tech buddies while making life more difficult and more expensive for everyday Americans.”

• Rep. Tom Kean (R-NJ) posted “China is actively working to circumvent U.S. export control laws and illegally obtain American-made AI chips. I introduced the Stop Stealing Our Chips Act with RepJulieJohnson to strengthen enforcement, prevent violations before they occur, and protect our national security. Backed by RepLisaMcClain, ChinaSelect, RepMoolenaar, CongressmanRaja, and RepJoshHarder, this bill makes it clear that illegal smuggling of U.S. technology will not be tolerated.”

• Rep. Robin Kelly (D-IL) posted “Big Tech is exploiting people’s private data, putting kids’ health at risk. I want clear rules so AI cannot act like a doctor or provide false medical advice and comprehensive privacy protections. As tech evolves, companies need to be held accountable to keep kids safe.”

• Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) posted “The threats from unchecked AI are real — worker displacement, corporate surveillance, invasion of privacy, environmental destruction, unmanned warfare. Today, a tiny number of billionaires are shaping the future of AI behind closed doors. That is unacceptable. That must change.”

What I’m Reading This Week

• More Evidence Your AI Agents Can Be Turned Against You, Derek B. Johnson, Cyberscoop.

• AI Regulation: The Next Big Global Policy Battle, Thanawat Chaiyaporn, Chiang Rai Times.

• More of Silicon Valley is building on free Chinese AI, Jasmine Cui and Jared Perlo, NBC News.

• Trump’s Push for More AI Data Centers Faces Backlash From His Own Voters, Jarrett Renshaw and Laila Kearney, Reuters.

About Zero One Strategies

Zero One Strategies is a boutique government relations practice dedicated to navigating the complex landscape of U.S. federal policy in emerging technologies. As advancements in technology continue to outpace regulatory frameworks, Zero One Strategies aims to provide strategic guidance and bipartisan advocacy for innovators and businesses operating at the forefront of technological development.

The practice focuses on key areas such as artificial intelligence, digital assets, blockchain, decentralized technologies, cybersecurity, data, and digital infrastructure, as well as the multiple policy issues impacting these sectors, including tax and financial services.

Contact us at Stacey@ZeroOneStrategies.com

If you like DC/ai Decoded, check out our other weekly newsletter on digital asset federal policy: